Case Study: Ransomware fears drove cyber security investments at Flinders University. Case Study: HIA bolsters customer acquisition with marketing platform upgrade. Vocus launches cloud-based calling offering for Zoom Phone. Venom BlackBook Zero 15 Phantom. How are parents utilising health tech to give their dogs a voice? The trends driving Australian businesses to bundle and aggregate services.
Technology predictions for and beyond. How long will a UPS keep your computers on if the lights go out? Endeavour Energy to create digital twin of its electricity network.
CouriersPlease uses IoT to keep track of transportation cages. Log In Don't have an account? Register now! If necessary, I will delay every project if it means that programs are right to go live," Schwarten said at the time. However, user numbers did not ramp up as intended, and the Queensland Floods proceeded to cause further delays.
Bates blamed IDES for the financial difficulties that CITEC is now experiencing, difficulties that have prompted former Federal Treasurer Peter Costello to recommend, in his recent audit of the state's finances, that the organisation, amongst other state-owned entities, be sold off to private interests. Developers are in short supply. Here are the skills and programming languages employers need. The painful shame of owning an Android phone.
McDonald's quietly revealed its stunning future -- and some customers will like it. Time for a Linux smartphone? If you use Google Chrome, you need to install this now. AWS launches new EC2 instance type for high performance computing tasks.
By June this year, only users were using the platform, according to the new State Government. Last week, new LNP IT Minister Bates said in a media release that the project was to be scrapped and never should have been approved in the first place. The program will now be closed by 30 June Bates said existing IDES users would be supported until a replacement was established. Mainstream enterprise IT strategy currently usually holds that the provision of email to users is a service that is highly commoditised in and can usually be outsourced to a more capable external organisation and delivered as a service.
I would envisage that identity management is currently too difficult a project for the Queensland State Government to tackle on a whole of government basis, and that this aspect is best managed by each individual department for now. Queensland has bigger fish to fry when it comes to technology projects right now. However, I consider a migration to these platforms to be a very remote possibility for Queensland, due to their nature as offshore-hosted environments.
Australian Governments usually want to keep their data onshore. It does when they have privacy concerns, statutory requirements, or general disdain for outsourcing of business-critical infrastructure. I am a mail admin at a regional university, and although we outsourced student email, there is no plan or even discussion around moving staff email offsite.
I agree with you that there are many cases where large organisations should run their own email platforms. However, staff email at a regional university is not one of those; and many Australian universities have already outsourced the staff email function.
While it has been pretty smooth for the students, their email is not a large problem domain, and on a few occasions I, the mail admin, have had to depend on Google support. I had to deal with the WoG mess many times. It ws poorly managed, and poorly implemented IMO. There is a lot of sensistive data that is handled in these government organisations.
Sensitive both to the government and to we the taxpayers personally. I understand that these companies have a wide variety of agreements etc , but the reality is it is still going offshore. Cloud solutions are really about dynamic workloads, with reduced maintenance and hardware costs as some of the big advantages. Effectively, replacing CAPEX with OPEX, and works really well with a reasonable agile business; where operational funding is the bread-and-butter model used for IT, or where funding is tied more to scale more funding as a business grows, for example, rather than static allocations.
Far from it. Just complex. And that always attracts a higher cost. You can only manage, plan and budget for so many variables, before hitting diminishing returns — as is often the case in so many areas.
0コメント